When my puppy was just a few months old, we got a silly little card from our vet saying that "everyday is a new adventure." In spite of how corny this sounds, such is the same for a librarian trying to plan their first digital library project.
My project, I feel, has really taken on the shape and direction that I was initially lacking ever since our Director of Academic Computing suggested that whatever I choose should dovetail into Sakai. Whether we use Sakai or not is almost moot, at this point -- the real idea here is that our systems should be wide open and able to "talk" to our other systems. AC is working on that on their end; likewise, we should too.
So... I just learned yesterday about Greenstone's ability to integrate with DSpace. Apparently, you can develop in Greenstone and then transfer your collections and metadata to DSpace rather easily, and vice versa. You can use Greenstone as the frontend for DSpace, or you can scrap it entirely.
We are still looking for our "quick and dirty" UI to mount our collections soon -- This is looking like a highly likely route.
Further reading:
Computer Science Thesis from Virginia Tech, outlining an open XML schema for DSpace
Friday, June 27, 2008
Wednesday, June 4, 2008
New PACSCL website
I am fortunate to be La Salle's web liasion to the Philadelphia Area Consortium of Special Collection Libraries. They have just launched a new dynamic website for member libraries to announce collections, exhibitions, lectures, etc. It is set up as a content management system, for member libraries to manage their own posts.
Check it out:
www.pacscl.org
Check it out:
www.pacscl.org
And the prize goes to... DSpace!
At long last, I have settled on developing DSpace for La Salle. Everytime that I talk repositories to faculty, they want to start throwing teaching materials into it. I found an interesting paper that talks about the possible integrations of DSpace with Sakai, an alternative to Blackboard which I was asked to find out how my systems may integrate with. Also, I saw a posting yesterday that Fedora and DSpace have recently decided to try to identify some areas to work together. We still don't feel confident that we could develop Fedora here without a programmer, but we feel good about DSpace being within our skillsets. I still have a crush on Fedora, and would welcome the intersection of the two systems to allow me more opportunity to play with that system as well.
I had originally not considered DSpace, as I always thought that it was just for ETDs. People are using it differently than that, and as I started demoing CONTENTdm and asking users about their experiences, I started getting pointed to DSpace more and more, given our desire to manage diverse scholarly materials and didactic resources. The dealsealer was seeing how Australian National University migrated from CONTENTdm into DSpace and came up with something what I would be looking to create for our Special Collections: http://anulib.anu.edu.au/subjects/ap/digilib/.
We're still early enough in our digitization game here that I don't want to end up locking us into a proprietary database without getting a greater sense of the digital directions of the campus. The openness of the code and flexibility of metadata input/output will set us up for optimum interoperability with future systems. Also, DSpace runs on Dublin Core, which is far from intimidating, but also allows input of METS, which I think should allow for a fun challenge.
Now the preservation question... OCLC's digital archive service is still looking pretty good, as they are reasonably priced compared to other services. I also may be looking at using the money that I save on software acquisition to mount an argument for Sun Microsystems' Honeycomb or something along those lines. It is too onorous to throw manual digital preservation administration and data backup on top of a librarian's other duties -- Therefore, all redundancies and reporting will be automated and/or outsourced so that it is done efficiently and effectively.
I had originally not considered DSpace, as I always thought that it was just for ETDs. People are using it differently than that, and as I started demoing CONTENTdm and asking users about their experiences, I started getting pointed to DSpace more and more, given our desire to manage diverse scholarly materials and didactic resources. The dealsealer was seeing how Australian National University migrated from CONTENTdm into DSpace and came up with something what I would be looking to create for our Special Collections: http://anulib.anu.edu.au/subjects/ap/digilib/.
We're still early enough in our digitization game here that I don't want to end up locking us into a proprietary database without getting a greater sense of the digital directions of the campus. The openness of the code and flexibility of metadata input/output will set us up for optimum interoperability with future systems. Also, DSpace runs on Dublin Core, which is far from intimidating, but also allows input of METS, which I think should allow for a fun challenge.
Now the preservation question... OCLC's digital archive service is still looking pretty good, as they are reasonably priced compared to other services. I also may be looking at using the money that I save on software acquisition to mount an argument for Sun Microsystems' Honeycomb or something along those lines. It is too onorous to throw manual digital preservation administration and data backup on top of a librarian's other duties -- Therefore, all redundancies and reporting will be automated and/or outsourced so that it is done efficiently and effectively.
Monday, May 19, 2008
DAM list
So, I keep using this blog more for the list of quick links at the right to cool digital libraries and less like a "web log." The bad librarian in me doesn't tag these entries anyway. I do think there is a shortage of comprehensive lists of systems, and I will do my best to keep this one up over time.
Wednesday, April 23, 2008
Hiatus over, summer's coming...
So, I have successfully lasted in my new position for about 9 months now, and can see the end of the school year. At some point around February, my schedule started to get crazier, and I knew that is a sign of my successes. Here's brief summary of our activities for the last 2 months.
DAM software -- Jury is still out, but we're getting close to a decision on how to proceed. After much deliberation, open source is out, as we just don't have the infrastructure to support it. CONTENTdm is still in the running. I am going to be looking at 3 more products -- VTLS's Vital, which runs on FEDORA, ArchivalWare and Olive. Hopefully we will have 1 -2 possible scenarios by next week.
OCLC's Dark Archive is another service that we are looking at, which would run complementary to the asset management system. I am not sure how widely publicized this is, as there are only currently about 30 customers for it. But OCLC will can be used as an outsourcing agent to manage the big wieldy masters, through a combo of tape and hard disk. They keep one copy of everything online on disk, and then keep 3-5 copies rotating through on tape. I feel really good about our possible adoption of this service.
I also successfully implemented our first distance library instruction service -- One of our prof's wanted me to go out to Buck's County to talk about the AV department, so I worked with our Academic Computing department to use recently acquired video conferencing equipment. It was a feel good experience for all, as the class was on new technology in the classroom, and we were able to lead by example. Also AC was excited to have an opportunity to use the equipment in a non-traditional environment, meaning not in one of the smart classrooms. I feel like in time library instruction will have to have this service readily available to accomodate the needs of further distance education iniatives.
I've been busy gallavanting around, too -- Attended the Computers in Libraries conference, Grant Writing at Palinet and a Web 2.0 / Scholarly Communication Symposium at Drexel. Comparable to drinking from a hose, I am fully information saturated. I will be excited to announce our new initiatives as they are fully flushed out in the next couple of weeks, though.
DAM software -- Jury is still out, but we're getting close to a decision on how to proceed. After much deliberation, open source is out, as we just don't have the infrastructure to support it. CONTENTdm is still in the running. I am going to be looking at 3 more products -- VTLS's Vital, which runs on FEDORA, ArchivalWare and Olive. Hopefully we will have 1 -2 possible scenarios by next week.
OCLC's Dark Archive is another service that we are looking at, which would run complementary to the asset management system. I am not sure how widely publicized this is, as there are only currently about 30 customers for it. But OCLC will can be used as an outsourcing agent to manage the big wieldy masters, through a combo of tape and hard disk. They keep one copy of everything online on disk, and then keep 3-5 copies rotating through on tape. I feel really good about our possible adoption of this service.
I also successfully implemented our first distance library instruction service -- One of our prof's wanted me to go out to Buck's County to talk about the AV department, so I worked with our Academic Computing department to use recently acquired video conferencing equipment. It was a feel good experience for all, as the class was on new technology in the classroom, and we were able to lead by example. Also AC was excited to have an opportunity to use the equipment in a non-traditional environment, meaning not in one of the smart classrooms. I feel like in time library instruction will have to have this service readily available to accomodate the needs of further distance education iniatives.
I've been busy gallavanting around, too -- Attended the Computers in Libraries conference, Grant Writing at Palinet and a Web 2.0 / Scholarly Communication Symposium at Drexel. Comparable to drinking from a hose, I am fully information saturated. I will be excited to announce our new initiatives as they are fully flushed out in the next couple of weeks, though.
Tuesday, February 5, 2008
Photomerge in CS3
We have only very small scanners at La Salle. I have a nice new Epson Expression 10000XL on order, but in the meantime I am using circulation's little 8 1/2 x 11 scanner that they use for e-reserves. Its a little cumbersome and far from ideal, but it allows me the opportunity to get to know the Photomerge function in Photoshop CS3 -- which is a certainly handy enough tool to share.
So here were my raw scans of an object that is approx. 20 in X 16 in.
So here were my raw scans of an object that is approx. 20 in X 16 in.
I opened all these up in Photoshop. All I did was go to File -- Automate -- Photomerge, and clicked add all open files, click OK -- And viola! Like a dream, it matches up all the scans perfectly to create a cohesive image, and even comspenates for seam lines, edges, and variations in scan quality and color.
I over cleaned it up a little bit in Photoshop, so this is not an archival quality object, but it gives me a "real" enough object to work with through our demos, and to see how MARC records will relate to it.
Pretty handy, eh? Created a good looking digital object in about 15 min, from scanning to finish.
Wednesday, January 16, 2008
Academy of Natural Sciences Digital Collections
I suppose this is also also a repository spotlight, but it is also a plug for a friend's institution. A friend of mine works as the cataloger at the Academy of Natural Science's library. She forwarded me the link to their digital collections today, and I really love the design of the site. They don't necessarily have a lot of their digitization work up there, but what they do have up there is colorful, bright and well-layed out. I would love to be able to click on a picture to get the full information, but it does a wonderful job of placing images in context and explaining what they are. Its quality of content over quantity, and I think in my heart that's what I'm feeling with all my introspection on design. I would go back to the site simply because it has beautiful vibrant images, and I can recall what the site made me feel after I leave it.
They, from what I know, don't have an internet access system, such as ContentDM or DigiTool or the other ones that I'm looking at. They rely on just solid design that integrates tightly and seemlessly into the Academy's website. The other sites that have content in an out-of-the-box looking DAM just don't give you the feeling of a) the institution's values; b) the richness of the materials; c) the method and rationale for digitization; d) connection to the rest of the institution.
Thanks, ANS -- I think you got it goin' on.
http://www.ansp.org/museum/digital_collections/
They, from what I know, don't have an internet access system, such as ContentDM or DigiTool or the other ones that I'm looking at. They rely on just solid design that integrates tightly and seemlessly into the Academy's website. The other sites that have content in an out-of-the-box looking DAM just don't give you the feeling of a) the institution's values; b) the richness of the materials; c) the method and rationale for digitization; d) connection to the rest of the institution.
Thanks, ANS -- I think you got it goin' on.
http://www.ansp.org/museum/digital_collections/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)